Menu
Login
Also forgot to state Carl Lanzisera also responsible for allowing a Board Member to abuse children. Look at your life Carl Lanzisera and your family as well as those you've guided. What kind of relationship do they have with their children because of your hate! Does that give you the right to direct that your board member abuse another's children! Hopefully, your tax exempt status will be revoked soon.
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
Carl Lanzisera of Americans for Legal Reform formed Weida Communications, SCL Ventures Inc. and Laser Recordings, Inc. The companies were shut down for insider trading. GOOGLE THEM ALL. He was the only one who was not arrested and who was not sued civilly.
Is our society so corrupt and the people attending the meetings so ignorant and greedy, i.e. the Board Member on Americans for Legal Reform - from Huntington Station, New York, that we support an Insider Trader!
Don't you think Carl Lanzisera of Americans for Legal Reform is insider trading your information to the corrupt ones?
Do not think the Board Member from Huntington Station, New York prevailed. She and the man into whose name she transferred her assets were essentially judgment proof. Noone wanted want they had because they had nothing.
This man takes dues from the most vulnerable of people who are suffering as a result of family court and then leaves them hanging out to dry. He is a thief, a liar, and is doing illegal business with a man who is practicing law without a license named George Homn.
Stay clear of this man and all the "help" that he offers.
I have been to many Americans for Legal Reform meetings in the last 2 yrs though not formally joined. Whoever wrote this critique of Carl is one giant bimbo! SEC law requires corporate leadership to register (notify) the SEC in a filing before they sell their [insider] shares. The notification becomes public. Analysts & speculators alike watch insider sales and acquisitions (insider trading) closely to determine a company's future performance. If an insider doesn't think their company is going to perform they might choose to move their assets (sell their shares) into an outside investment they believe to be more profitable...or might want to fund a start-up venture...or pay some personal liabilities, etc.
As for allegations of insider trading of the criminal kind this is common sense anyhow. If someone isn't arrested it means they weren't guilty of insider trading of the criminal kind...the criminal kind being sharing company news to individuals to give them an edge over the general public before news is publicly announced. If others are arrested & a jury of their own peers finds them guilty then we presume guilt of insider trading [of the criminal kind].
Carl has made a heck of a load of enemies in the legal community on Long Island for helping Americans for Legal Reform meeting attendees find justice and I am finding the critiques of Carl to sound like political retribution. Come to our meetings. Carl is very kind and likeable. He's also very informative and does his best to steer all we needy aspiring pro se litigants in the right direction so that we can help ourselves.
By the way, I googled Weida and found the info to be false so didn't bother to google the others. Carl's critic very visibly knows nothing of SEC law and that as corporate leadership...an insider he is required by law to notify the SEC (Securities & Exchange Commission) in a filing made public when he wants to sell any of his shares in each of the ventures mentioned. Carl's critic is a dunce for confusing his SEC filing (observation of SEC law) with criminal insider trading!