Menu
For Business Write a review File a complaint
CB Medical Services and Facilities LabCorp A doctor is signing off on drug test fraudulently his license was pulled he should not be able to sign off on any testing
LabCorp

LabCorp review: A doctor is signing off on drug test fraudulently his license was pulled he should not be able to sign off on any testing 28

K
Author of the review
10:53 pm EDT
Review updated:
Featured review
This review was chosen algorithmically as the most valued customer feedback.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1996-07-30/html/96-19257.htm

He is working under labcorp out of Texas and several other states and the testing is FALSE HE IS a fraud

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages [protected]]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-19257]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[Docket No. 96-7]

David R. Nahin, M.D.; Revocation of Registration

On November 9, 1995, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an Order to Show Cause to David R. Nahin, M.D., (Respondent) of Waukesha, Wisconsin, notifying him of an opportunity to show cause as to why DEA
should not revoke his DEA Certificate of Registration, AN7645229, under 21 U.S.C. 824(a), and deny any pending applications for renewal of such registration as a practitioner under 21 U.S.C. 823(f), for the reason that his continued registration would be inconsistent with the public interest. On November 27, 1995, the Respondent, through counsel, filed a timely request for a hearing, and the matter was docketed before Administrative Law Judge Mary Ellen Bittner. However, on January 19,
1996, the Government filed a Motion for Summary Disposition and to Stay Proceedings with copies of supporting documents. Specifically, the Respondent voluntarily had surrendered his medical license pursuant to a copy of the State of Wisconsin, Medical Examining Board's (Medical Board) Final Decision and Order dated April 28, 1993. Further, pursuant to an order of the Medical Board's dated August 9, 1994, the Respondent was granted a limited medical license which precluded him from having physician-patient contact. Also, a letter dated September 27, 1994, from the State of Wisconsin, Department of Regulation and Licensing, informed DEA that, ``while Dr. Nahin is not prohibited from holding a DEA registration, use of the registration in prescribing medications would constitute a violation of his limited license.'' The Respondent was afforded an opportunity to respond to the Government's motion on or before February 5, 1996, but no response was filed.
On February 15, 1996, Judge Bittner issued her Opinion and Recommended Decision, (1) finding that the Respondent, practicing medicine under

[[Page 39669]]

a limited license in Wisconsin, lacked authorization to handle controlled substances there, (2) granting the Government's Motion for Summary Disposition, and (3) recommending that the Respondent's DEA Certificate of Registration be revoked. Neither party filed exceptions to her decision, and on March 15, 1996, Judge Bittner transmitted the record of these proceedings and her opinion to the Deputy Administrator.
The Deputy Administrator has considered the record in its entirety, and pursuant to 21 CFR 1316.67, hereby issues his final order based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law as hereinafter set forth. The Deputy Administrator adopts, in full, the decision of the Administrative Law Judge. The Drug Enforcement Administration cannot register or maintain the registration of a practitioner who is not duly authorized to handle controlled substances in the State in which he conducts his business. See 21 U.S.C. 823 (f) (authorizing the Attorney General to register a practitioner to dispense controlled substances only if the applicant is authorized to dispense controlled substances
under the laws of the state in which he or she practices); 802(21) (defining ``practitioner'' as one authorized by the United States or the state in which he or she practices to handle controlled substances in the course of professional practice or research); and 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3) (authorizing the Attorney General to revoke a registration upon as finding that the registrant ``has had his State license or registration suspended, revoked, or denied by competent State authority and is no longer authorized by State law to engage in * * * dispensing of controlled substances * * *''). This rerequisite has been consistently upheld. See Dominick A. Ricci, M.D., 58 FR 51, 104 (1993); James H. Nickens, M.D., 57 FR 59, 847 (1992); Roy E. Hardman, M.D., 57 FR 49, 195 (1992); Myong S. Yi, M.D., 54 FR 30, 618 (1989); Bobby Watts, M, D., 53 FR 11, 919 (1988).
Here, it is clear and undisputed that the Respondent currently is not authorized to handle controlled substances in Wisconsin. Likewise, since the respondent lacks state authority to handle controlled
substances, DEA lacks authority to continue his registration. Judge Bittner also properly granted the Government's motion for summary disposition. The parties did not dispute that the Respondent
was unauthorized to handle controlled substances in Wisconsin, the state in which he conducts his practice. Therefore, it is well-settled that when no question of fact is involved, a plenary, adversary
administrative proceeding involving evidence and cross-examination of witnesses is not obligatory. Dominick A. Ricci, M.D., 58 FR at 51, 104; see also Philip E. Kirk, M.D., 48 FR 32, 887 (1983), aff'd sub nom Kirk V. Mullen, 749 F.2d 297 (6th Cir. 1984); Alfred Tennyson Smurthwaite, M.D., 43 FR 11, 873 (1978); NLRB v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, AFL-CIO, 549 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1977).
Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, pursuant to the authority vested in him by 21 U.S.C. 823 and 824, and 28 CFR 0.100 (b) and 0.104, hereby orders that DEA Certificate of Registration AN7645229, previously issued to David R. Nahin, M.D., be, and it hereby is, revoked, and any pending application for renewal of such registration is hereby denied. This order is effective August 29, 1996.

Dated: July 24, 1996.
Stephen H. Greene,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-19257 Filed 7-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M

Desired outcome: FIRED JAILED SHOULD FILE A COMPLAINT WITH DOJ

28 comments
Add a comment
N
N
nicole bogard
US
Aug 18, 2021 9:22 pm EDT

Finally my research of this Dr is paying off. He is signing off on test that are ripping families apart I haven't seen my kids in 2 years because of this so mro not even reviewing the test and actually he supposedly was doing this out of Indianapolis Indiana sending test to a vacant building. I also ran a background check on him and was completely shocked I suggest everyone question everything. I looked him up and found this out two more mros they are using are Steven paschal and John tetrick. These drs are not reviewing anything and if parents do the research they would be shocked.
A broken mother because of these drs they need to be stopped.
From Texas
Rebecca bogard

A
A
anelson41815
Gallatin, US
Feb 15, 2022 6:33 am EST
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Did you have a case with this? I’m going through the same thing.

N
N
nicole bogard
US
Feb 22, 2022 11:58 pm EST

I have a cps case because of these drs. They are no good. My email is alwaysrosie84@gmail.com

You can find me on Facebook Rebecca Nicole bogard for more information

A
A
Amanda C Meyer
US
Apr 24, 2023 5:46 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

I emailed you

J
J
Jarrod Kelley
Conroe, US
May 01, 2023 1:41 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

https://thedailycounternews.com/2023/01/11/fbi-raids-premier-medical-laboratory-services-used-by-south-carolina-dss/comment-page-1/#comment-249

Most recent information on Dr Nashin..

A
A
Amanda C Meyer
US
May 03, 2023 6:16 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Holy [censored]ing [censored]! Who the hell was the lead investigator at the FBI for this cause he needs to go raid Texas Alcohol and Drug testing in Houston, Tx that who DFPS Region 7 uses. They of course send to I3Screen and use Dr. Nahin! These people have to be stopped! [censored] thing is I think DFPS is actually just falsifying the test results themselves! I've found errors on the test results I've gotten back from them and there is No Real Lab would ever make those kind of mistakes on Drug results

A
A
Amanda C Meyer
US
May 03, 2023 6:17 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

It's it Quest Diagnostics Here not LabCorp

C
C
CYCollins
Rock Hill, US
Oct 19, 2024 2:35 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Most recent article by Nicolas Knight journalist SC The Post and Courier. SCDSS and their continued fraudulent drugs texts.

From: Clancy Collins
Date: September 13, 2024 at 8:35:33 PM EDT
To: Sylvia Beachy
Subject: Fwd: SOUTH CAROLINA DSS CONTINUES ITS FRAUDULANT DRUG TESTS ON PARENTS


Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: The Daily Counter News
Date: September 13, 2024 at 8:34:57 PM EDT
To: clancy.collins@icloud.com
Subject: SOUTH CAROLINA DSS CONTINUES ITS FRAUDULANT DRUG TESTS ON PARENTS


Read on blog or Reader
Site logo image The Daily Counter News
SOUTH CAROLINA DSS CONTINUES ITS FRAUDULANT DRUG TESTS ON PARENTS


By Nicolas Knight on August 30, 2024
In 2022, The Daily Counter News released an article on Dr. David Nahin, a Medical Review Officer involved in fraudulent South Carolina DSS drug tests. This article sparked an investigation into Premier Biotech, who conducted these fraudulent tests for the South Carolina Department of Social Services.

This investigation became National News as several truck loads of documents and equipment were removed from the main facility by the Federal Bureau of Investigations, along with other federal agencies.

One week after the article was released the company i3Logix, who Nahin worked for, announced his sudden passing.

Recently, The Daily Counter News was contacted by 2 Parents who stated they were victims of DSS fraud. These parents stated that their positive drug tests were signed by Dr. Nahin dated November of 2023, nearly a year and a half after his announced death.

The documents shown to the Daily Counter News were signed by Dr. Nahin dated November of 2023, a year and a half after his alleged death was announced. The compared signatures from earlier cases matched the November 2023 document. These new documents are from a Chesterfield County DSS case that is still ongoing and raises many more questions.

First, the Players in this Story:

Dr. David Nahin: A Medical Doctor from Wisconsin who lost his license in 1993, and then became a Medical Review Officer (MRO) for i3Logix out of Denver, Colorado.

Dr. Nahin received what is called a limited Medical license in 1994. This allowed him to use the title, but he was prohibited from any contact with patients, nor could he write any scripts for medications. It was given based on the fact he had completed the educational requirements for the title.

i3Logix: This company seems to reinvent itself every few years. In 2022, when we first began investigating it, it was listed as a paper industry company. Now, it has listed itself as a software company under the new title "Ballotrax", which is an election monitoring company.

On the companies LinkedIn page, it lists many of its employees as software engineers but lists one MRO (not named).

SOUTH CAROLINA DSS: The State Agency is tasked to ensure the children of South Carolina are protected from harm and abuse.

Which is now headed by Mike Leach, formerly from Tennessee's Department of Children's Services. Where 1000's of children went missing while within their system.

Mr. Leach interestingly states on his LinkedIn page, "that he is an influential promoter, able to sell projects to a skeptical audience."

SOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN: Individuals under the age of 18 who have no voice in the legal system within South Carolina.

THE PARENTS: The biological guardians of children under the State Law.

In the next article on this subject we will be diving into Dr. Nahin's past and his connection to South Carolina Department of Social Services.

IF YOU FEEL YOU HAVE BEEN A VICTIM OF FRAUD PERTAINING TO DRUG TESTING IN FAMILY COURTS IN SOUTH CAROLINA BY SOCIAL SERVICES CONTACT THE CAMDEN LAW FIRM [protected].

Comment
The Daily Counter News © 2024.
Manage your email settings or unsubscribe.
WordPress.com and Jetpack Logos
Get the Jetpack app
Subscribe, bookmark, and get real‑time notifications - all from one app!
Download Jetpack on Google Play Download Jetpack from the App Store
WordPress.com Logo and Wordmark title=
Automattic, Inc.
60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110

C
C
CYCollins
Rock Hill, US
Oct 19, 2024 2:45 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more
Replying to comment of CYCollins

https://thedailycounternews.com/2023/01/11/fbi-raids-premier-medical-laboratory-services-used-by-south-carolina-dss/

https://thedailycounternews.com/2020/08/23/child-trafficking-and-the-department-of-social-services-connection/

https://thedailycounternews.com/2022/03/06/the-invisible-dr-david-nahin-and-court-ordered-drug-tests-in-south-carolina/?relatedposts_hit=1&relatedposts_origin=4448&relatedposts_position=0

F
F
Flygirl110
Winnipeg, CA
Jan 31, 2022 11:55 pm EST

Hi, can you tell me more? I m in the same position where this dr is signing off on tests in a child case. Thanks

A
A
anelson41815
Gallatin, US
Feb 15, 2022 6:31 am EST
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more
Replying to comment of Flygirl110

Do you have any more information? I’m in the same position and I’m in TN.

A
A
anelson41815
Gallatin, US
Feb 15, 2022 6:32 am EST
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more
Replying to comment of Flygirl110

Hi, do you have anymore information on this? I’m going through the same thing here in TN.

View 0 more photos
H
H
Hailey Gibson
US
Sep 19, 2022 9:51 am EDT

Email me at haileygibson529@gmail.com I have info an been through same exact thing maybe we can put our facts an evidence together an get something done

V
V
Veronica Ve
US
Mar 15, 2023 2:33 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Hello please can I email you

A
A
Annette Maddux
US
Aug 15, 2022 7:10 am EDT

My baby girl was taken by cps for the same thing. Dr. David Nahim signing off on a test after 17 mts of clean hair and ua’s. The very last court date. (I thought she was coming home) A test with stuff I had never ever done and large amounts of it. I was tpr’d on the spot. I begged the judge to let me pay for a test right then and there because I knew they were lying. Didn’t even consider it. He knew what they had done! It makes me physically ill, what they put my child through and what I went through. What is wrong with these people?

H
H
Hailey Gibson
US
Sep 19, 2022 9:49 am EDT

Hey email me please, haileygibson529@gmail.com I had same incident an we all need to come together an get something done about this!

J
J
Jarrod Kelley
Conroe, US
May 01, 2023 1:56 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Replying to comment of nicole bogard

https://thedailycounternews.com/2023/01/11/fbi-raids-premier-medical-laboratory-services-used-by-south-carolina-dss/comment-page-1/#comment-249

V
V
Veronica Ve
US
Mar 15, 2023 2:32 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

I have the same issue. I lost all 4 of my kids even though the metadata shows the document is false.

J
J
Jessica Bach
US
Mar 27, 2023 4:52 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Me too! I lost custody of my 2 boys bc of this man’s falsified results he signed off on! How can we find out who has jurisdiction over the investigation?

J
J
Jessica Bach
US
Mar 27, 2023 4:55 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

I lost custody of my two boys because of this David Nahin as well! Im located in South Carolina! How can we find out who has jurisdiction over the investigation? Because I got a call from the FBI and they questioned me about him but later when I called for an update she told me they did not have jurisdiction anymore and she didn’t know who did!

J
J
Jarrod Kelley
Conroe, US
May 01, 2023 1:51 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

More than likely the FBI is keeping This information privileged information. CPS generates a ton of money for our non trusted government Agencies… so naturally that is why they respected him as dead two weeks after this but it’s a coverup on a massive scale that has had an impact on several hundred of thousands lives in the us..

C
C
CYCollins
Rock Hill, US
Oct 19, 2024 3:23 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Yes you are exactly right it’s linked to Child Sex Trafficking here in SC. Please email me clancy.collins@icloud.com

K
K
kimberli mott
US
Apr 04, 2023 7:34 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

So is that saying that he didn't have any kind of license to be an MRO and how do I go about finding out and getting proof that he was never an MRO plez help I need proof asap

J
J
Jarrod Kelley
Conroe, US
May 01, 2023 1:40 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

https://thedailycounternews.com/2023/01/11/fbi-raids-premier-medical-laboratory-services-used-by-south-carolina-dss/comment-page-1/#comment-249

J
J
Jarrod Kelley
Conroe, US
Apr 29, 2023 4:14 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

LISTEN UP everyone! Please.. I’ve just started researching information regarding this agency that calls themselves CPS . And nothing about the P in that acronym stands for protection so I’m am pursuing them with everything in me and to my last red cent if need be. This Dr. Nahin , whom I have heard is dead now… not sure about the truth. But anyways he was the doctor that was involved in my fiancés CPS case that resulted in her loosing her Beautiful baby girl. The last hair follicle test was the deciding factor.. with that being said if ANYONE HAS INFO that is current regarding this Dr. Because this article is from 1996.. her case was in Montgomery county Texas in 2019. The same year that Terry Jaggers , who was the director of CPS of Montgomery county during that time she was found guilty of embezzlement and charged for stealing 180000 from the non profit organizations funds and served like one night in jail or something weak as hell and fined. Other people were involved as well like commissioner and some other political figures … the good ole boys group.. but not the ones that were just and moral who believed in a throw down and fought for their rights against people like jaggers and Meadors.

Since 2019 I have watched my lady saturate her life in tears, Desperately trying to figure out what happened with her case, and I’ve wondered how in the hell they ( Montgomery county CPS ) and family court system could get away with this scandal so….. it is now my mission in life to have the chance to raise a beautiful little girl and do not want to see the woman I love, live forever in a depression if she doesn’t get her baby back!) Please, Please, it is the end of April of 2023. I’m just now getting started because I’ve had enough of this whole shindig and can’t stand it any more.. I am not scared of the system and I do not think I will fail.

If anyone needs any information fighting for your rights to be reinstated or if you have any information regarding Dr. Nahin, please contact me at greasemonkey.x1@gmail.com Tootightgarage2018@gmail.com or simply call me or TEXT me (I must be crazy to put my number) [protected] ( not crazy just want Montgomery County and the system to be liable for their actions, dissolve the corruption, and give Annette,my girlfriend, another trial in their family court division which isn’t even considered a legit court and the judge isn’t a judge rather a judge’s assistant… and the CPS case workers as well as judges and prosecutors are granted immunity in the case! Come on y’all.. this is not fake. This is true. Granted immunity for perjury! How in the £

C
C
CYCollins
Rock Hill, US
Oct 19, 2024 2:42 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

https://thedailycounternews.com/2023/01/11/fbi-raids-premier-medical-laboratory-services-used-by-south-carolina-dss/

C
C
CYCollins
Rock Hill, US
Oct 19, 2024 2:46 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

https://thedailycounternews.com/2022/03/06/the-invisible-dr-david-nahin-and-court-ordered-drug-tests-in-south-carolina/?relatedposts_hit=1&relatedposts_origin=4448&relatedposts_position=0

C
C
CYCollins
Rock Hill, US
Oct 19, 2024 2:55 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

If anyone needs help with the Dr. David Ralph Nahin, Medical Review Officer, with no active medical license in practicing state of Wisconsin, nor an active medical license in South Carolina.

My son was illegally removed from my custody, placed in the custody of SC DSS, then placed at a SCDSS licensed boys group home Second Chance Emergency Placement In Spartanburg, SC
07/16/2021-12/17/2021 where my son was a victim of Child Sex Trafficking. All because of falsified drug tests results signed of by Dr. David Ralph Nahin.

Please contacted me if you need help, or can possibly help me. clancy.collins@icloud.com 10/17/2024

More LabCorp reviews & complaints

LabCorp - Rude 50
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
LabCorp - Fraudulent billing 5
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
LabCorp - Credit card charge required for guaranteed services 6
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
LabCorp - Billing/insurance 7
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
LabCorp - bad experience
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
  1. LabCorp Contacts

  2. LabCorp phone numbers
    +1 (800) 845-6167
    +1 (800) 845-6167
    Click up if you have successfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (800) 845-6167 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have successfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (800) 845-6167 phone number Click down if you have unsuccessfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (800) 845-6167 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have UNsuccessfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (800) 845-6167 phone number
    +1 (336) 436-7104
    +1 (336) 436-7104
    Click up if you have successfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (336) 436-7104 phone number 1 1 users reported that they have successfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (336) 436-7104 phone number Click down if you have unsuccessfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (336) 436-7104 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have UNsuccessfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (336) 436-7104 phone number
    100%
    Confidence score
    Sales Representative
    +1 (630) 390-9399
    +1 (630) 390-9399
    Click up if you have successfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (630) 390-9399 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have successfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (630) 390-9399 phone number Click down if you have unsuccessfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (630) 390-9399 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have UNsuccessfully reached LabCorp by calling +1 (630) 390-9399 phone number
    Regional Manager
    More phone numbers
  3. LabCorp emails
  4. LabCorp address
    1250 Chapel Hill Rd., Burlington, South Carolina, 27215, United States
  5. LabCorp social media
  6. Janet
    Checked and verified by Janet This contact information is personally checked and verified by the ComplaintsBoard representative. Learn more
    Nov 20, 2024
  7. View all LabCorp contacts