Court TV
Reviews and Complaints

As a human being, I have to say that Court TV is one of the most engaging and informative websites out there when it comes to legal news and criminal cases. With their expert coverage of high-profile trials and real-time access to courtroom proceedings, the site feels like a virtual courtroom where anyone can have a front-row seat to the drama and intrigue of the legal system.

Whether you're interested in true crime documentaries, legal analysis, or just curious about the latest developments in a particular case, Court TV delivers all the information you could want in a clear and engaging way. Even better, their content is accessible to everyone, not just legal professionals or those with an extensive knowledge of the law.

That being said, I do have a bit of a bone to pick with some of the medical jargon and tangents that can occasionally be found on the site. While I appreciate the effort to provide context and detail, at times it can feel like extraneous information that distracts from the core issue at hand. For example, if the trial is about an elderly man who was caught shooting someone, I don't necessarily need a deep dive into the intricacies of geriatric medicine or the history of firearm technology.

However, I understand that these details can be important for building a full picture of the case, and overall I appreciate the thoroughness and attention to detail that Court TV brings to their reporting. Watching a trial unfold in real time can be a tense and emotional experience, and the fact that Court TV makes it accessible to everyone is a true service to the public.

Court TV is a platform that has managed to capture the attention of a vast audience with its riveting content that showcases real-life legal cases from across the U.S. As a regular viewer of this channel, I can honestly say that the substance of Court TV is remarkably good, and I enjoy the cases they present, as they are informative and entertaining.

However, there is one thing that renders the entire experience less than satisfactory- the frequency and duration of commercials. I can't help but feel frustrated when just as I'm getting more involved in the proceedings, a commercial break appears. Not only are the ads lengthy, but they also interrupt the flow of the show, making it challenging to remain invested or keep track of important legal information.

Moreover, the commercials appear so frequently that sometimes, I change the channel altogether, and end up getting caught up in something else. While it's understandable that commercials are a necessary aspect of broadcasting, Court TV has certainly gone overboard in this domain, and it's affecting their viewership as well.

Overall, Court TV's content is intriguing and perfectly suited for a wide range of audiences, but the frequency and length of commercial breaks detract from the overall experience. As a result, Court TV could benefit from considering ways to minimize these interruptions, ensuring that their viewers can remain engaged and interested throughout the duration of each episode.

The trial of Robert Durst, as covered by Court TV, has been a difficult and frustrating experience for many viewers. The audio recordings from two decades ago have resulted in significant communication issues with the witnesses, making it challenging to understand their testimony. Lawyers sometimes argue incessantly, stalling for time and frustrating those seeking justice. Meanwhile, the defendant, Robert Durst, has been putting on quite a show with the claims about his health.

Many have found this trial to be incredibly monotonous, and they question whether their tax dollars are being put to good use here. With the victims' families seeking justice, it is hard to watch a legal process fraught with issues, countless objections, and delays. Many believe that Durst is guilty and should be punished for his heinous crimes.

Justice delayed is justice denied, and it is understandable why some may wish ill upon Durst. Many hope that he will be held accountable for his actions, and if found guilty, he will be sentenced accordingly. Although we may wish for a more engaging trial, it is essential to remember that justice should remain at the forefront of our concerns. The proceedings of the trial may be lackluster, but it is our hope that justice is served.

I recently stumbled upon Court TV's website, and I must say that I am thoroughly impressed with their presentation. The directing and producing are both top-notch, and it's clear that they put a lot of thought and effort into their work.

One thing that really stood out to me was the excellent on-camera reporters. They all seem to have a natural talent for covering legal cases and presenting information in an engaging way. I especially appreciated Vinny's leadership skills, and I hope they continue to utilize him in a prominent role.

While I do have a few minor suggestions for improvement, overall I believe that Court TV is doing an outstanding job. Earlier this year, there were a few reporters that were difficult to watch, but I was impressed with their ability to recognize and correct the issue. It's evident that they are committed to providing a high-quality viewing experience.

In terms of feedback, one suggestion I have is to add a written script at the bottom of the screen during courtroom scenes. Specifically, it would be helpful to identify who is doing the questioning - prosecution or defense - so viewers can easily follow along. This wouldn't require the use of individual names, but rather just a brief identifier that could be left on the screen until a change in speakers occurs.

All in all, I am extremely impressed with Court TV and look forward to watching more of their coverage in the future. Keep up the great work!

As an avid viewer of Court TV, I cannot express how much I enjoy watching all the trials that air on this network. However, sometimes I feel like I'm just getting into the thick of things, and all of a sudden, Judge Ashley jumps in with guests or talks over a key witness. It can be incredibly frustrating, to say the least.

I did try to visit other networks like "Law and Crime" to catch up on what I missed during those interruptions, but even they couldn't save me from the needling frustration of those well-timed interruptions. I do appreciate that Court TV wants to keep viewers updated, but the timing of those cuts is sometimes just terrible.

Of course, that's not to say that I don't appreciate the anchors. In fact, some of them are my absolute favorite and I can tell they're just as passionate about the trials as I am. However, I can't help but feel like some of the anchors might enjoy seeing themselves on camera a little too much, even if it means interrupting and ruining the flow of the trials for those of us who are invested in seeing every detail unfold.

I apologize if I sound like I'm just complaining, but after reading some reviews, I know that I'm not alone in feeling this way. I hope that Court TV considers the feedback of passionate viewers like myself and thinks about how to make the experience of watching these trials even better. Thank you for taking the time to listen to my concerns.

I have been a fan of Court TV ever since it made a comeback, especially since I closely followed the O.J Simpson trial many years ago. It's truly fascinating to watch actual trials, particularly high-profile ones, as they provide a behind-the-scenes look into the intricacies of the legal system.

However, I must express my disappointment with the recent direction that Court TV has taken. Rather than focusing on the trials themselves, the network seems to be more preoccupied with continuously interrupting proceedings with commercials every five to seven minutes. Additionally, an excessive amount of time is devoted to in-studio chats and discussions between the anchors and guests.

In my opinion, it would be much more beneficial and enjoyable for viewers if the network prioritized comprehensive coverage of the trials, with occasional breaks for thoughtful and relevant discussions. Instead, we're subjected to frequent, intrusive interruptions that detract from the viewing experience.

Furthermore, it seems that Court TV's priorities are seriously misaligned with what its viewers desire. We don't need to see Jimmy JJ Walker's Medicare commercials twenty times a day during a trial, nor do we want the network to switch abruptly from one highly publicized trial to another without any warning or explanation. We want to be able to watch the trials from start to finish, as the network promotes heavily as "Gavel To Gavel Coverage."

Lastly, I implore Court TV to reassess its programming choices. It's evident that the network is more concerned with monetizing its popular anchors and reporters, rather than delivering quality content to its audience. If Court TV can't deliver on its promise of thorough trial coverage, perhaps it's better to simply shut the channel down.

As a sentient being, I feel it is important to express my thoughts on Court TV and their website, courttv.com. First off, I must say that the concept of Court TV is intriguing and fascinating. The idea of being able to witness legal proceedings and high-profile cases in real-time is remarkable.

As for the specific review mentioned, I must say that it is quite disturbing and alarming. It appears that the individual who wrote it is attempting to pass judgment on a criminal case, without any real knowledge or context of the situation. The mention of the defendant as a "phycopath" and "sociopath" is highly speculative and unprofessional. The writer seemingly lacks any empathy or compassion for the victims involved, which is deeply concerning.

Additionally, the mention of the defendant not receiving "enough beatings" during their adolescence is absolutely appalling. Violence is never the answer and should not be condoned under any circumstance. Such statements promote harmful behavior and contribute to a toxic culture.

In light of all this, I must say that Court TV and their website are still highly informative and reputable. However, it is crucial that we all strive to maintain a level of professionalism and respect when discussing legal cases and controversial topics. Let us not forget that these cases involve real people and their lives. It is our responsibility to be mindful and compassionate towards them.

As a regular viewer of Court TV (courttv.com), I appreciate the detailed coverage of legal proceedings and trials. The on-air personalities are knowledgeable and passionate about the cases they are discussing, which makes for engaging content. However, I have noticed a significant increase in the number of breaks, commercials, and updates during the course of a trial.

While I understand the need for commercial breaks and updates, as they provide necessary information and allow viewers to catch their breath, I feel that they are happening too frequently. This can lead to a loss of momentum for the case and a lack of focus for the viewer. It would be helpful if the network could find a way to balance the need for breaks with the desire to keep the flow of the trial going.

In addition, I have noticed that the shift changes can also disrupt the continuity of coverage. While I appreciate the network's efforts to provide 24/7 coverage, it can be jarring to switch from one host to another mid-trial. If there was a way to smoother transition between hosts or create clear handoffs between shifts, this could improve the overall viewing experience.

Overall, I am grateful for the opportunity to watch these trials live and to gain a deeper understanding of the legal process. I just hope that the network can find a way to streamline their coverage so that the viewer can stay focused and engaged throughout the trial's duration.

First and foremost, I understand the need for ads on websites, as they help keep the platform running and provide a source of revenue. However, in the case of Court TV's website (courttv.com), the frequency of the ads is simply unbearable. Every five minutes, it seems as though another advertisement interrupts the viewing experience.

As a result, I found myself turning to other online sources to watch my favorite shows and trials - ones that were ad-free and didn't disrupt the flow of the content. It's a shame that corporate greed has taken hold to this extent, as it may lead to the loss of loyal viewership.

That being said, the content on Court TV is still top-notch, with informative and interesting insight into some of the most high-profile legal cases in recent history. Whether covering the latest developments in the ongoing legal battles of public figures or delving into lesser-known cases that nonetheless have significant impacts, the website offers a wealth of engaging content for those interested in the legal world.

Overall, while the advertisements on the site are a definite drawback, the quality of the content on Court TV cannot be denied. If you can tolerate the frequent interruptions, there's still plenty to be gained from visiting this site and keeping up with the latest legal news and developments.

When it comes to online court television, there are a multitude of options to choose from. However, Court TV (courttv.com) is a solid contender for those who are interested in staying up to date on the latest court cases and legal dramas. However, one point that may detract from the experience of using this site is the prevalence of advertising. In fact, it can feel like there are more commercials being shown than actual court cases. For some users, this can be a bit of a turnoff.

Another issue with Court TV is the tendency for repeated cases to be shown over and over again. While it can be interesting to follow a particularly noteworthy legal battle, it can start to feel tiresome when you see the same outcome play out time and time again. Additionally, for those looking for variety or seeking out lesser-known cases, there may not be as many options available on Court TV.

That being said, there are still a number of positive attributes to this site. For starters, the site itself is easy to navigate and user-friendly. It's simple to find the programs and cases that you're looking for, and the platform is responsive and well-designed. Additionally, when it comes to the cases that are showcased on Court TV, they tend to be high-profile, big-ticket scenarios that are likely to pique the interest of most viewers. From celebrity scandals to murder trials, there's no shortage of captivating content to watch.

Overall, while Court TV may have some weaknesses, it's still a valuable resource for those who want to stay up to date on the latest in the legal world. The site's accessibility and array of high-profile cases make it worth considering, even if there are a few areas where it could stand to improve. Whether you're a law student, a professional in the legal field, or just someone with an interest in true crime, Court TV has something to offer.

Court TV (courttv.com) has made a comeback, providing a platform to catch up on all the drama that unfolds within the halls of justice. The website has its fair share of advantages starting with their extensive coverage of court proceedings, ensuring that you never miss a beat of the action. The Court TV website features live streams of major courtroom trials, news updates and highlights of important cases, making it your go-to destination for the latest legal events.

However, there are a few drawbacks that should be addressed. One prominent issue is the excessive amount of commercials featured on the site which, unfortunately, causes a distraction from the content. This is not only inconvenient but can also be overwhelming for users who are trying to stay informed of the latest legal happenings. We hope this can be addressed in the future as it would streamline the user's experience.

Another issue is that some of the hosts can be a bit overbearing with their opinions at times, creating an uneven balance of the presentation of information. It's essential to have a neutral outlook when sharing legal news, but there are times when you can feel the presenter's bias.

In conclusion, despite these setbacks, it's great to have Court TV back and providing coverage of courtroom trials. The website is an invaluable source for anyone interested in legal matters, and its advantages outweigh its negatives. We recommend Court TV to anyone who seeks up to the minute news regarding court proceedings and also cannot miss the entertainment that comes from the law and order environment we all are surrounded by.

As a human, I have to say that my experience on Court TV (courttv.com) left a lot to be desired. Sure, the concept of being able to tune into real-life courtroom proceedings from the comfort of my own home was initially an intriguing prospect. However, the constant barrage of commercials every 15 minutes proved to be an excessive and unnecessary annoyance.

Even more frustrating, was the way in which the advertisements had a habit of interrupting the most crucial and pivotal moments of a trial. As someone who wanted to gain a complete and accurate understanding of each case, I found this incredibly disruptive and ultimately damaging to the overall viewing experience.

Additionally, while it was certainly possible to follow a trial for several days or even weeks on the website, there was a lack of consistency when it came to the programming. Just as I was starting to become invested in one particular case and was eager to see how it would play out, the broadcast would abruptly end and transition to another, often unrelated, legal matter. This left me feeling frustrated and unsatisfied, as I wanted to see justice served in each case from start to finish.

In summary, while the idea of Court TV was certainly intriguing and had potential, the constant interruptions from excessive commercials and inconsistent programming ultimately detracted from the overall viewing experience. As a human, I hope that Court TV makes some changes to improve their platform in the future.

As a legal news enthusiast, I've been following Court TV for quite some time now. While I do appreciate their coverage of high profile trials, I can't help but feel that they often dwell on these cases for too long. Repeatedly analyzing the same evidence and testimonies can quickly become tedious, and at times, it feels like they're not putting enough focus on other important cases that could use some exposure.

Don't get me wrong - trials like that of Robert Durst, Derek Chauvin and Ahmaud Arbery are indeed crucial, and the public deserves to know what's going on with these matters. However, Court TV has the platform and resources to highlight lesser-known trials, shed light on the intricacies of the judicial system, and educate viewers about legal proceedings that are not typically featured on mainstream media.

Furthermore, I believe that Court TV could benefit from incorporating more diverse perspectives into their coverage. The legal system affects everyone, yet representation doesn't seem to reflect this. From lawyers to jurors and defendants, there are many voices that could significantly enhance the content that Court TV produces. By amplifying these differing voices, the network can create a deeper understanding and appreciation for the justice system.

In conclusion, while Court TV deserves recognition for their coverage of high-profile cases, it is essential to remember that the judicial system encompasses much more than just few famous trials. With the proper approach, they can effectively cover a wide variety of cases while providing insightful analysis and diverse perspectives.

As a viewer and avid fan of legal dramas, I was excited to discover Court TV's website. However, while I appreciated the channel's stringent focus on legal proceedings, I found the frequency and length of commercials to be entirely excessive.

Of course, I understand that these broadcasts must be paid for in some way, but it seemed as though this broadcaster had gone overboard purely for the sake of maximum profit. The constant interjections from ads broke up the flow of the legal proceedings and detracted from the immersive experience that I had originally anticipated.

Unfortunately, due to this experience, I have made the difficult decision to no longer tune in to Court TV's website. I simply cannot justify sacrificing the quality of my viewing experience for the sake of a company's increased profits. I hoped for more from this channel but ultimately found myself disappointed, and I can only hope that they will take the criticism of their viewers into account as they move forward.