Sky Sports
Reviews and Complaints

Disgusted by your commentators downplaying the seriousness of the Huddersfield manager coming on the pitch it led to a serious altercation afterwards and inflamed the crowd.

Not only was it disgraceful it was dangerous and any of the Leeds players would have been within their rights to confront him.

It was classless to run on the pitch before the game was finished and to downplay the commentary gives the impression that this behaviour is acceptable.

Having been a loyal Sky customer for 20 years, I am extremely disappointed in the lack of live sport and losing sports such as Champions League and the Australian Big Bash, England Ashes tour down under for the next 5 years, What else are we likely to lose? We have 5 sport channels and very little live action, ok you shoe a lot of NFL and premier league games, but with the price of our packages going up with us losing big name events.
During our summer, we have a lot of cricket, one day and T20, but not much shown, elite league speedway, didn`t get much live action last year, are we going to get more this year...?
I don`t understand why you show old stuff or repeat stuff on the 5 channels, I am seriously considering getting rid of my sky sports package as I feel its not worth it.
I want to see more Rugby League, Speedway and Cricket.
I used to watch NBA but you lost that, Big Bash - you lost that.
I am just concerned that SKY will lose more in the future.
5 sport channels and today only live Spanish football and Golf, not good enough.
I will see what happens this year with your programming and if it doesn`t improve then myself and many others will drop sky sports or sky altogether.

Listening to Gary Neville again commentating
Could the man be more biased or boring if he tried
Ex united player biased commentary
Shouldn't allow players that played for one team their whole career commentate for the team they played for
It's mundane and
Incredibly tedious listening to his very monotonous voice
Change this please I love footie but I turn over if he's commentating and listen to 5 live

On behalf of +5000 Sky Sports customers joining social network page to express their frustration against Mr Gary Neville, I would like to kindly request you to remove Mr Gary Neville from giving commentary on any Sky Sports Channels as he does not have the sufficient skills and capabilities to deliver a football game commentary fairly e.g. in many occasions he would simply argue on a fair challenge as a wrongful challenge even though the evidence shows its a fair challenge. He is very biased when it comes to Manchester United games which puts off other supporters. A commentator should not be biased and should only give fair commentary on both sides to make the game enjoyable for all supporters.

I hope this complaint would be considered seriously and relevant actions are taken as soon as possible against Mr Gary Neville.

I would like to complain about the lack of knowledge of the commentary during the start of the highlights of Bradford City vs Chesterfield on Sunday 8th May. There was a minutes silence for the Bradford City fire (11th May 1985) to commemorate the 56 who died in the fire which I was present at that day.

There a large flag in the middle of the pitch. The commentator said wrongly "It was to mark the respect of those who have passed away during the season", no mention of the 56 who died even though the flag clearly stated the 56. This shows the lack of knowledge and respect in my opinion. This would have been very different if it was the Hillsborough remembrance.

Andrew Kay

Andy Townsend must be the worst presenter on Skysports. For a individual that has played the game his comments and views has been shocking. All you hear out his mouth is negativity. I believe no matter what team you are he has something negative to say. No wonder he will never be a Premier League Manager. His distasteful comments of teams makes you want to turn the television off. He continues to criticise players and teams and think he has enjoyed the failure of top teams like Liverpool, Manchester United and more.

Once again i am disgusted that the decision makers have deemed not to cover speedway enough on sky tv. The speedway grand prix wont be covered through lack of viewers.

the viewing figures are down because the muppets who schedule do not have a regular time slot on one channel resulting in confusion as to when the programmes are on therefore the viewing figures are down : what a surprise!

you need to get behind the sport and give it a chance to increase popularity

Mark Harvey a speedway fan

Liverpool v Everton on 7/2/15 commentator Alan Smith was so biased it was unbelievable. Steven Gerard seemed to be only player on the park as it was only name Alan said during whole game. All Everton passes were never mentioned, if I was not actually watching the game I would have thought Liverpool was only team on the park

The amazing anti-Chelsea tirade by Jeff Stelling on Sky Sports (28/12/14) illustates the clear anti-Chelsea bias in the media and Sky in particular. To paraphrase he basically said Cheslea being denied a clear penalty at Southampton was payback for the times they have dived to earn them. He made no such condemnation, to my knowledge, of the many dubious penalties awarded to Sky favourites Liverpool last season. In fact Sky revelled in Liverpool's (laughably) unsuccessful attempt to win the Premier League last year, fuelled by penalties. I did not see any condemnation from Sky of the disgraceful antics of Suarez at Norwich, where he went from writhing in agony to springing up and sprinting goalwards when a scoring opportunity appeared. Sky's anti-Chelsea agenda is perfectly clear - a hard earned point away at high flying Southampton negatively described as points dropped; whilst Liverpool scrambling 1 point from 6 with late equaliser is them on the way back. We know Sky's priorities, Liverpool and United, with Chelsea most hated.

I always appreciate that there will be a little bias of ex football pro's when commentating on football matches live on Sky Sports as they are only human. Listening to Tony Gale in the first half of the West Ham v Arsenal match on sky sports 28/12/14 I really started to get fed up of listening to it. He was so West Ham bias, that when an Arsenal player was obviously kicked over in the west ham goal area, he said 'well I guess the red had to give it, but West Ham Re very unlucky'. This among other curious comment s he was making and has made in the past against Arsenal shows he has a real chip on his shoulder about them Nd I feel should be excused from commentating on them. I'm happy for Arsenal to be picked apart by people like Gary Neville and Graham souness as they at least given constructive and realistic refections on the game in front of them, even thought they are Man U and Liverpool through and through, they still stay impartial. tony Gale as far As commentating on Araenal is a discgrace. Sorry, but it is true.

Watching the WBA vs. Man Utd game last night 20/10/14. Alan Smith clearly wanted WBA to win the game. Every time WBA had the ball (not very often) his tone of voice was one of excitement. WBA incidents were commented on correctly as fouls etc, where he missed a lot of the incidents where Man United were victims or brushed them off. This was a very similar vein to the man united vs. Leicester game where again he incorrectly commentated on incidents involving Man United.

If you look at the Stats from the Match, they show Man United were on top in the game - this was not reflected in commentary. On top of the bias he is actually very wooden and really quite boring as a commentator.

Please please please remove Mark Roe from the commentary team . His quite clear favouritism for Tiger Woods is quite frankly sickening and has on several occasions led to me to switch off . At times his comments about Woods are quite unbearable regardless of whether he's leading or missed the cut! It seems the guy has a rather unhealthy obsession with Woods one that suffering viewers such as myself should not have to tolerate !

Why is Niall Quinn commentating on the Chelsea v Arsenal game? He is clearly biased and is giving a one sided view. He should take a leaf out of Gary Neville's book who always manages to give clear, concise commentary, even when Manchester united are playing. We ahve had to put the TV on mute as he is driving us mad!

jaimie redknapp is the worst sports tv presenter to watch, and he constantly butts in and talks over the other better presenters on sky sports, he is always cutting them short and talking over them in that annoying twang and i can t undersrtand why the presenter aand the other pundits dont just tell him to shut up and let them speak ?
there are loads of much better footbal pundits ( and better footballers) than redknapp,
he is so annoying, I have to watch other channel,
at least someone tell him to allow others to speak, , , and that it it not HIS show

What bad/sad/disappointing coverage of the Golf we are suffering. Whilst spending a fortune on too many commentators who do not stop talking, imparting needless information, we are now only shown the top few players for hours on end. No one would imagine that there are over 60 golfers on the course and that your viewers are interested in more than the leaders, either because they have friends, family or acquaintances and/or have put bets on some. The PGA have got it right by periodically showing everyone's score at the bottom of the screen and believe it or not showing more than the leaders playing. Please take a lesson from them and spend more on camera men than on commentators. Hilda

Whilst watching arsenal v Newcastle I would like to say that Alan parry's commentary was completely one sided towards arsenal. Surely commentary is supposed to be objective but he sounds like a season ticket holder the way he is going on. Disgraceful

I personally found it extremely rude how the interviewer cut off Andre Villas Boas during the post match interviews in the game Chelsea v Man Utd. Allowing Alex Ferguson to rant and rave about other potential penalty decisions that the linesman missed, and then stopping Villas-Boas on commenting on his views is unacceptable. The man will obviously have his opinion about the two penalties given - especially since they contributed to the result! I think Sky Sports need to stop this 'everyone has an opinion' facade when they clearly feel that certain opinions arent relevant. Such a concidence that any comments on Man Utd and their 'hepling hand' from the referees are never discussed.

Having watched the Premier League football match between QPR and Chelsea I would like to stress my dissatisfaction in the way that John Terry (Chelsea Player) is not suspended from playing football until the allegations of racism is looked into. Despite whether Anton Ferdinand speaks out about the incident I being a black sky subscriber and having watched the match and the clip replayed on the Internet have no doubt that John Terry was evidently raciest. I not only take offence to him being a England Player/Captain but also to the fact that I pay for my sky subscription and expect that protocol is followed regardless of the amount of money or the type of career you hold. Racism of any type will not be tolerated by myself and I do not expect to pay for the right to experience such vulgarity.